Make it Cheaper, Make it Better
Recommendations from the OHFB Delivery Systems Committee:
After six months of hard work, the Delivery Systems Committee presented delivery system reform recommendations to the Health Fund Board in May. The Delivery Systems Committee had the hard task of developing recommendations to create high-performing health delivery systems in Oregon that provide high quality, timely, efficient, effective, and safe health care.
The Delivery Systems Committee recommendations fall into eight main topic areas:
- Primary Care and Chronic Disease Management - Encourage the use of primary care by offering Oregonians so-called "integrated health homes" that can manage and coordinate their care;
- Improving Quality and Transparency – Improve the availability of information about health care quality and costs and report it in a clear and easily accessible manner;
- Payment Reform Models – Support the development of new payment models that encourage providers to be more accountable for the quality and costs of the care they provide;
- Comparative Effectiveness and Medical Technology Assessment – A public-private collaborative effort to ensure that treatment and coverage decisions are based on the best available research and data;
- Shared Decision Making – Identify opportunities for patients to be more involved in decisions made about their care;
- Public Health Prevention and Wellness – Develop more unified, community-driven efforts to improve population health through prevention;
- Administrative Simplification and Standardization – Identify ways to decrease health care spending through more streamlined administrative processes;
- Reduced Pharmaceutical Spending – Encourage bulk purchasing to decrease spending on prescription drugs.
Throughout its recommendations, the Committee attempted to identify ways to contain costs across the delivery system. A final version of the Committee recommendations will be available on the Health Fund Board website by the middle of the June.
How do you think system savings should be achieved in Oregon? What are the best ways to reduce costs without compromising quality or access? Should cost be a driving factor in reform?
Recent Comments